About my book "Introduction to Indexable Tooling for the Metal Lathe"
About my book "Introduction to Indexable Tooling for the Metal Lathe"
When I first got my metal lathe (a Precision Matthews GT), I made the early decision to avoid making and sharpening my own HSS tools if possible. This decision was driven largely by the fact that I have been a woodworker all my life and have 20 or so woodworking planes, and twice that number of chisels that all require regular sharpening. I really wanted to be free from that chore in my metalworking pursuits.
After four years of talking with tooling engineers, buying tooling, testing inserts of various types, and absorbing most of the available literature on the topic, I decided to document my newly acquired knowledge and experience, turning it into a combination “buyers guide” and “reference book” to help others. Writing and illustrating the book became my full time “covid lockdown” project lasting close to a year with over 1,000 hours invested in its creation.
In many ways, the result is the user guide I wish someone had given me when I began to investigate indexable tooling. And I still use the book myself as a reference any time I want to source a new insert or cutting tool for my lathe, or when users post questions related to these topics. It's available from Amazon at this link.
Attachments
Some of the members here on Hobby-Machinist ask questions about my book “Introduction to Indexable Tooling for the Metal Lathe”. So, I thought I would post some sample pages from the book, to give an overall flavor of the writing style, and include the complete Table of Contents as an attachment here. Have a look at the attached if you’re interested.Hi, David; I've had your book on my wishlist for a while, so I guess it's time to buy it. However, a quick question: from the samples pages, it looks like you discuss larger (1/2" & up) tool holders and corresponding inserts – do you also include data and info for 1/4", 5/16" & 3/8" tools holders?
When I first got my metal lathe (a Precision Matthews GT), I made the early decision to avoid making and sharpening my own HSS tools if possible. This decision was driven largely by the fact that I have been a woodworker all my life and have 20 or so woodworking planes, and twice that number of chisels that all require regular sharpening. I really wanted to be free from that chore in my metalworking pursuits.
After four years of talking with tooling engineers, buying tooling, testing inserts of various types, and absorbing most of the available literature on the topic, I decided to document my newly acquired knowledge and experience, turning it into a combination “buyers guide” and “reference book” to help others. Writing and illustrating the book became my full time “covid lockdown” project lasting close to a year with over 1,000 hours invested in its creation.
In many ways, the result is the user guide I wish someone had given me when I began to investigate indexable tooling. And I still use the book myself as a reference any time I want to source a new insert or cutting tool for my lathe, or when users post questions related to these topics. It's available from Amazon at this link.
Thanks,
Charlie
Hi, David; I've had your book on my wishlist for a while, so I guess it's time to buy it. However, a quick question: from the samples pages, it looks like you discuss larger (1/2" & up) tool holders and corresponding inserts – do you also include data and info for 1/4", 5/16" & 3/8" tools holders?Hi Charlie,
Thanks,
Charlie
You are correct that the specific "shopping lists" for toolholders in the book references 1/2" – 3/4" shank tooling. There are two main aspects to the book content. One aspect is to demystify insert terminology and help uses make sense of it in a way that they can make more informed decisions about selecting an insert for specific materials and operations. That discussion should be pertinent to smaller toolholder applications. Another aspect of the book makes specific recommendations on toolholders and inserts to go with them for 10-14" lathes and lists specific model numbers from quality manufacturers for 1/2", 5/8", and 3/4" shank turning and facing toolholders. There is some discussion of smaller boring bars as well. Some H-M users have contacted me via DM and asked for guidance on selecting smaller indexable tools for their 7 or 8" mini lathes, and I've shared some ideas with them, but at that end of the scale, the viability of indexable tooling is largely wrapped up in questions about the machines power and rigidity. Tell me a bit more about the machine you are trying to match up with indexable tools please.
Hi Charlie,David,
You are correct that the specific "shopping lists" for toolholders in the book references 1/2" – 3/4" shank tooling. There are two main aspects to the book content. One aspect is to demystify insert terminology and help uses make sense of it in a way that they can make more informed decisions about selecting an insert for specific materials and operations. That discussion should be pertinent to smaller toolholder applications. Another aspect of the book makes specific recommendations on toolholders and inserts to go with them for 10-14" lathes and lists specific model numbers from quality manufacturers for 1/2", 5/8", and 3/4" shank turning and facing toolholders. There is some discussion of smaller boring bars as well. Some H-M users have contacted me via DM and asked for guidance on selecting smaller indexable tools for their 7 or 8" mini lathes, and I've shared some ideas with them, but at that end of the scale, the viability of indexable tooling is largely wrapped up in questions about the machines power and rigidity. Tell me a bit more about the machine you are trying to match up with indexable tools please.
Thanks for the reply. I'm happy with the assortment of tool holders that I am using on my 7x16 Mini-Lathe (primarily on Aluminum and free-cutting steels), so the lack of specifics on the holders themselves shouldn't be an issue. However, the information concerning insert designations and materials will be invaluable, particularly as it relates to "translating" between ANSI & ISO terminology and also types of inserts designed specifically for Aluminum, which I like for the excellent finishes that can be obtained (due primarily to the smaller radius tips & lower tool pressures I assume). This information would be applicable to some of my LMS Hi-Torque Mini-Mill indexible holders as well.
My introduction to machining was on a 9" South Bend 50 years ago, and I always struggled with grinding bits for use in the lantern tool post, so like you looked to inserts as an alternative when I started my hobby shop. While I do make use of conventional HSS for the occasional special bit, I rely on a set of 3/8" A.R. Warner tool holders (CCMW 21.5x T-15 inserts) and 8mm Diamond tool holders (1/4" Crobalt®) from Eccentric Engineering when I'm not using no-name 8mm or 10mm insert tool holders & Carbide.
Regards,
Charlie
Selecting Carbide Inserts for Metalworking - Kennametal
For as long as there’s been tungsten carbide (which is roughly nine decades), machinists have been brazing small hunks of it to steel shanks and then grinding a sharp edge on the result. These brazed carbide tool bits and boring bars are easy to make, customizable to the application, and inexpensive. Unfortunately, their effectiveness depends on the machinist’s brazing and grinding skills. And since the tool must be removed from the mill or lathe for sharpening, they also lead to significant and costly machine downtime.
For more information, please visit Guangzhou Ruiyi Technology Co., Ltd..
HSS tool bits present a similar story. They’ve been around even longer than brazed carbide. They’re much less expensive than carbide and there’s no need for brazing—just sharpen the tip however you want and get cutting. Sadly, you won’t be cutting very long or very quickly because HSS boasts a cutting speed of just one-fourth that of tungsten carbide, and even less compared to some of the newer, coated grades. HSS might be fine for hobbyists with loads of time on their hands, but carbide is the first choice for professional machine shops.
That statement extends to HSS rotary tool bits such as end mills, drills, and reamers, all of which are used daily throughout the manufacturing industry. That’s a shame. Yes, these tools are less expensive than their solid carbide alternatives, but as mentioned, they’re also far less wear-resistant, predictable, and productive. These factors explain why leading cutting tool manufacturers emphasize the importance of carbide tooling to their customers and why many have stopped offering HSS cutting tools altogether.
That leads us to indexable carbide inserts, the workhorses of the machining industry. As with old-fashioned brazed tools, indexables also utilize small bits of carbide. The difference is how they’re attached. Rather than a permanent braze, indexable tooling relies on a screw or clamp to secure the carbide insert to the tool body. When the edge becomes worn, swapping it out only takes seconds. More importantly, there’s no loss of position or need to “touch off” the tool. Just remove the old insert, stick in a fresh one, and get to work.
Where machinists and toolmakers once had to grind special shapes into their brazed or solid carbide tools, they now have the option of buying off-the-shelf indexable inserts in a huge variety of geometries and styles. Need to cut a 1/16” wide groove in a shaft? How about an Acme thread, or a 45-degree chamfer around a part periphery? These and other insert shapes are readily available, no grinding necessary.
Indexable cutting tools are especially important on CNC machinery, where the need to keep spindles turning at all times is critical. Here, machinists rely on indexable drills—often with coolant running through them—to make holes quickly, followed by indexable boring bars to finish machine them. Indexable face mills true up large flat surfaces; indexable end mills rough out pockets and cut slots; indexable profiling tools trace complex part shapes. There’s very little that can’t be machined with indexable cutting tools.
But how do you know what carbide inserts and cutter bodies to buy? And why are there so many different grades of carbide inserts out there? Good questions; we’ll start with the second one first. Unlike a few decades ago, when machinists had just a few grades to choose from, there are now dozens of inserts grades, coatings, and chip-breakers available.
The company is the world’s best Indexable Tools supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.
Many of these are tailor-made for specific materials or material groups. For instance, a shop making aerospace components can greatly increase efficiency by purchasing carbide inserts designed for tough, heat-resistant superalloys (HRSA) such as Inconel and Hastelloy. The same is true for medical shops, which tend to cut corrosion-resistant, biocompatible materials like 316 stainless steel, cobalt chrome alloy, and titanium. Automakers can dial in their processes by using inserts optimized for cast iron and low carbon steel, while oil and gas producers benefit from tooling that excels in duplex steel.
Simply put, if there’s an alloy out there, the chances are excellent that a material-specific carbide grade is available to cut it. However, some shops machine aluminum one day, iron the next, and titanium the day after that, often in low quantities. Does this mean they need to bloat their tool crib with dozens upon dozens of different carbide insert grades and geometries, many of which will only be used occasionally?
Probably not. Just as there’s no shortage of indexable carbide tooling optimized for certain materials, there’s also no shortage of excellent general-purpose cutting tools. These represent a middle ground between performance and the tool crib bloat just mentioned. That said, the decision to go the material-specific route is a delicate balancing act—if a job’s going to be in the machine for more than a few days or is sure to come around again in a month or two, it almost always makes sense to buy carbide inserts designed for that material.
Last but not least is the whole topic of insert nomenclature. It’s a deep subject, one filled with exceptions and cutting tool-specific rules. Regardless, most manufacturers follow the ANSI or ISO tool identification system (and sometimes both). We won’t get into the details here except to say that it uses an alphanumeric code to specifies an insert’s shape (round, square, triangular, etc.), clearance angle (neutral to positive), tolerance (some inserts are pressed to size, while others are ground), the size of the locating hole (if any) and clamping method, its size and thickness, corner radii, and various other defining features (see the chart above for an example).
Complex naming systems aside, however, choosing the right insert for your machining application isn’t as difficult as it might appear. That’s because cutting tool manufacturers have developed online tool advisors that walk machinists and programmers through the tool selection process. For example, Kennametal.com has a collaborative space that prompts users to answer questions about the metal removal process (milling, turning, or holemaking), the machine tool that will be used, workpiece material and removal amount, and expected depths of cut. It then generates a machining strategy along with insert and toolholder suggestions, ordering information, product availability, feed and speed recommendations, and more.
Long story short, carbide insert selection is much easier than it once was, even though the number of cutting tool options has grown exponentially since the days of brazed carbide and HSS tool bits. Download a catalog, log in to Kennametal.com or give your local cutting tool representative a call. You’ll be making chips in no time.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit CNC Lathe Tools.